• Skip to content
  • Skip to footer

Lucem

Intellectual Property (Patent, Trademark & Copyright)

Main navigation

  • PEOPLE
  • SERVICES
    • Intellectual Property
    • Litigation
    • Business Law
  • RESOURCES
  • ABOUT US
  • Contact
  • English
  • Korean

lucem_admin / February 1, 2021

Principal vs. Supplemental Trademark Register

Principal vs. Supplemental Trademark Register

Author:  Karen Y. Kim

Within the United States Patent and Trademark Office, two trademark registers exist – the Principal Register and the Supplemental Register.  Most trademark applications seek registration on the Principal Register by default.  However, if during the prosecution of the application, the examining attorney determines that a mark is merely descriptive, and therefore ineligible for the Principal Register, amendment to the Supplemental Register might be recommended by the examining attorney, or an applicant may voluntarily amend the application to the Supplemental Register.  In some cases, an applicant may argue that the mark has acquired secondary meaning or distinctiveness and is, therefore, still entitled to remain on the Principal Register.  For an intent-to-use application, the applicant would need to file an amendment to allege use before amending to the Supplemental Register.

So what are the differences between the two registers?  The Principal Register provides certain presumptions and advantages that the Supplemental Register does not.  The chart below summarizes the differences between the Principal Register and the Supplemental Register:

Principal Register Supplemental Register
Presumption of validity No presumption of validity
Presumption of ownership and exclusive right to use the mark in commerce No presumption of ownership or exclusive right to use the mark
Provides constructive notice of the owner’s right to use the mark throughout the entire U.S. No constructive notice
Can become “incontestable” by filing a Section 15 affidavit after 5 years of continuous use Cannot become incontestable
Can be a basis for filing Madrid Protocol applications Cannot be a basis for filing Madrid Protocol applications
Can file applications on an intent-to-use basis Must be used in commerce to file or amend an application to the Supplemental Register
Can be used to prevent the importation of counterfeit goods by recording with the U.S. Customs Services Cannot be recorded with the U.S. Customs Service

With all these differences and disadvantages of the Supplemental Register, why would anyone want to amend their application to the Supplemental Register?  A registration on the Supplemental Register still provides the trademark owner with certain benefits including:

  • the right to sue in federal court for trademark infringement
  • the right to use the ® symbol
  • blocking third parties from registering confusingly similar trademarks

Further, after the mark has been registered on the Supplemental Register for 5 years, the registrant can reapply for the Principal Register by providing evidence that the mark has been in continuous use and has acquired secondary meaning.

 

Filed Under: Trademark

Footer

ADDRESS

660 S. Figueroa St. Suite 2300
Los Angeles, CA 90017

Tel 213.387.3630
Fax 213.863.6332
info@lucemlaw.com
CONTACT US
PRIVACY
DISCLAIMER

© 2012-2025 · Lucem PC